Basically, the voices were understandable, no problem there. I was just commenting on the fact that it doesn't sound like an actual dialog, the way the conversation flows, because both speakers seem to have full knowledge of the topic and perfectly fill in the next talking point, one after another. A single speaker would be enough, or perhaps have one speaker in more of a listener role with the other focusing more on providing details. Not a really important matter, though---the information was very interesting, which is the main point.
I hate quantum physics. Why? because that's ALL I understand about quantum mechanics, that I don't know anything at all about it. The fact that I CAN'T know anything about it is why I hate it. When failing to understand something, I study it to gain a foundational knowledge about it. Particle Physics is something that I have tried to wrap my brains around my whole life but simply cannot do it. I'm not wired to understand this topic and it bothers me. Does anyone have a pill that can help me with this problem?
Wow. It seems like science is blind (on purpose) to the one change that has been made regarding young children which might explain the 4000 percent increase in Autism over the last 30 years. EXPERT: Ah, let's see here. What has changed to cause such an increase in Autism? Oh, I see, it must be a GENE on the y chromosome. LAY PERSON: But Doctor, could the fact that 40 years ago, children received only 5 vaccines to the age of 18 and now they receive SEVENTY TWO? EXPERT: No. That's not possible. We are currently examining the possibility that it must be the increase in cow flatulance.
Sea Cucumber? We've tried everything else, why not go under the sea and find the most obscure, ugliest, most hideous looking creature in God's Creation and try using its ability to make a new kind of sugar and try it out on cancer patients. If you believe that they are actually spending 10s of millions of dollars on discovering a cure for cancer, BILLIONS over the years, perhaps you should consider that cancer is the single BIGGEST cash cow for the medical industrial complex and big pharma that there has ever been and cancer FUELS the profit of these two more than any other disease.
Now, understanding that this world loves MONEY more than anything else in it, would it be feasible to believe that they are truly attempting to put an end to cancer? Or, would it be more realistic to imagine that they are using these labs and modern medical technology to INCREASE cancer among the population? Let's look at the statistics: At the beginning of the 20th century, one person in twenty would get some form of cancer. In the 1940s it was one out of every sixteen people. In the 1970s it was one person out of ten. Today one person out of three gets some form of cancer sometime in the course of their lifetime. The same experts that calculated the autism rate must have been employed to come up with cancer rate and ignore the elephant in the room each time.
Maybe more later, but for now - luving the “what did we learn today” section.
Lots-o-good reading 🥸🙂.
You do a great job Manuel!! Thanks so much for your hard work!! I research voluntarily for 2 guys and you really add a lot!!
The narration for the giant sea virus video sounded like an internal dialog of someone with multiple personality disorder...
True. An AI video. I think I could do much better... But don't know when I will start with videos. Should I?
Basically, the voices were understandable, no problem there. I was just commenting on the fact that it doesn't sound like an actual dialog, the way the conversation flows, because both speakers seem to have full knowledge of the topic and perfectly fill in the next talking point, one after another. A single speaker would be enough, or perhaps have one speaker in more of a listener role with the other focusing more on providing details. Not a really important matter, though---the information was very interesting, which is the main point.
I hate quantum physics. Why? because that's ALL I understand about quantum mechanics, that I don't know anything at all about it. The fact that I CAN'T know anything about it is why I hate it. When failing to understand something, I study it to gain a foundational knowledge about it. Particle Physics is something that I have tried to wrap my brains around my whole life but simply cannot do it. I'm not wired to understand this topic and it bothers me. Does anyone have a pill that can help me with this problem?
maybe this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHEhxPuMmQI
Wow. It seems like science is blind (on purpose) to the one change that has been made regarding young children which might explain the 4000 percent increase in Autism over the last 30 years. EXPERT: Ah, let's see here. What has changed to cause such an increase in Autism? Oh, I see, it must be a GENE on the y chromosome. LAY PERSON: But Doctor, could the fact that 40 years ago, children received only 5 vaccines to the age of 18 and now they receive SEVENTY TWO? EXPERT: No. That's not possible. We are currently examining the possibility that it must be the increase in cow flatulance.
Sea Cucumber? We've tried everything else, why not go under the sea and find the most obscure, ugliest, most hideous looking creature in God's Creation and try using its ability to make a new kind of sugar and try it out on cancer patients. If you believe that they are actually spending 10s of millions of dollars on discovering a cure for cancer, BILLIONS over the years, perhaps you should consider that cancer is the single BIGGEST cash cow for the medical industrial complex and big pharma that there has ever been and cancer FUELS the profit of these two more than any other disease.
Now, understanding that this world loves MONEY more than anything else in it, would it be feasible to believe that they are truly attempting to put an end to cancer? Or, would it be more realistic to imagine that they are using these labs and modern medical technology to INCREASE cancer among the population? Let's look at the statistics: At the beginning of the 20th century, one person in twenty would get some form of cancer. In the 1940s it was one out of every sixteen people. In the 1970s it was one person out of ten. Today one person out of three gets some form of cancer sometime in the course of their lifetime. The same experts that calculated the autism rate must have been employed to come up with cancer rate and ignore the elephant in the room each time.
Screw the ghastly solar panels and their toxic production!
Electrogravitics – My Knowledge of Free Energy (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/electrogravitics-my-knowledge-of
good newsblast title