8 Comments

MSHA. Make Switzerland Healty Again

Expand full comment

I don't believe the NBC story about the 287% increase in birth control requests. Not for a minute.

Expand full comment
Nov 9Edited

Manuel, you just gave me a very interesting bit of information which I can use to PROVE that the earth is NOT 4.5 billion years old as modern science speculates (insists). Calculate the number of meteorites that have struck the earth in those 500 years (lots of them; must have added quite a bit of weight to our earth, right?) Now estimate their weight and then multiply that weight times NINE MILLION. That would add so much material to the earth over those 4.5 billion years that our planet would be 100 times bigger than the sun!

Here's the math that I used to get to 9m: 1bn/500yrs=2m;2mX4.5=9m So, that would be 9 MILLION times the weight of meteorites falling which we saw in the clip which itself was a STAGGERING amount in only 500 years. AND, you must add to that weight, all of the meteors that didn't strike the earth but burned up THEN fell to earth as dust and gases. Add to that the SPACE DUST that falls to the earth (different than burned up meteors) to the tune of 40,000 metric tons/yr. 40,000 tons times 4.5 billion?

In a futile attempt to explain this away so it would fit their claim of a 4.5 billion year old earth, one Cambridge scientist says that 50,000 tons of the earth's mass is lost every year by the escape of Hydrogen and Helium into space. This is not even proven factual but if it was a fact, all the H and He would have disappeared LONG before 4.5b years had elapsed and NOTHING would be here. The earth doesn't "leak" anything into space; it's all held by gravity. THINK! If some of the H and He could escape, ALL of it could escape.

This scientist attempted to cover up the truth by explaining the earth's weight gain by space dust but he didn't bother to calculate the trillions of tons of meteorites which would have fallen in that amount of time.

Now let's consider the moon. The same amount of dust and rocks would have fallen on the moon in 4.5b years (which they say is also the age of the moon). Do the same math but figure in an additional factor to multiply by the product because of the lack of atmosphere on the moon. In 4.5 billion years, the moon would be the size of the sun.

Scientists of today agree on something called uniformitarianism which is just a fancy word for saying that our universe has functioned relatively the same way since the big bang so they can't imagine that perhaps there was a period of time when no meteors were falling on the earth or the moon. Any way you add it up, the earth couldn't POSSIBLY be 4.5 billion years old.

Expand full comment

And I forgot one other important point. This space dust is MEASURABLE on the moon. There are no weather factors (wind, erosion, etc.) on the moon allowing us a "still" picture of the debris from space dust accumulating on the moon since it's ah, hum, formation.

If we are to believe that Neil Armstrong put his foot down on the surface of the moon - question for another investigation - if the moon were accumulating space dust for 4.5 billion years as is claimed by modern science, Neil would have sunk into that soft, silvery powder 625 feet. Never mind that, the lunar module would have done the same! Also another evidence that the Apollo missions were bogus, Hollywood productions! We been had BAD since we all were in diapers!

But why? Why did they create such a preposterous program? It's my contention that NASA is the biggest money laundering entity in history! They needed a place to spend unlimited amounts of money and they couldn't reveal the TRUE intention - that the money would be used on earth-or, shall I say, UNDER the earth, digging massive expanses of tunnels connecting cities underground all over the world. This would be astronomically expensive, hence, the space program, Ain't nobody didn't go to no moon. To the moon, yeah, uh huh.

Expand full comment

Here is the definition of a clinically insane, bleeding heart, liberal wacko government: In the face of the intentional stocking of criminal illegal immigrants into the country by the millions, actually finding them in foreign countries jails, releasing them (murderers and pedofiles and the like) and bringing them into the US, they say, “The food being provided at shelters was culturally insensitive.”

The jails they came from are not like the jails of this insane country where right is wrong and wrong is right, no, prisons in South America are still PRISONS and they care much less for the "human rights" of murderers and child abusers. The prisoners are thankful when the GET ANY food to eat that isn't rotten.

Do you think they came here complaining about what they were being served in our shelters? Pizza, Beef Stew, Hamburgers and hot dogs, DELMONICO STEAK and for dessert, Klondike Bars, Drumsticks, Hostess cakes.

I know, I used to work for a food service company, and I ordered this stuff and shipped it to the local jail! The shelters must be feeding their occupants even better than that! It's as if someone in the US gov't was given a job which was to find and install any laws that are contrary to what should be, and pay them 1m per year.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the worldwide coverage, Manuel & HOORAY for the bells!!! ;-)

Expand full comment

Finally some good news! THANK YOU! The first pictures are great, quite a difference!

There is more on Trump and RF Kennedy Jr here:

https://teachersforchoice.substack.com/p/donald-trump-appoints-big-pharma

The best is to subscribe personally to some reliable source of info before saying anything. The entire current MSM has the new scapegoat Bobby Kennedy, a white HEALTHY MAN, physically and mentally...

Expand full comment