Manuel, are you okay? I haven't gotten a notification from your substack since Monday. Am I missing your daily newsletter? Let us know what's up if you're sick or something. We regulars worry about you. We live in a new world, not a brave one but a wicked one. Pls advise.
Nope. I figured it was something like that. So, I have a lot of catching up to do, huh? Good. I look forward to your newsletter and if I don't get it every day, I feel uninformed!
One fact that is rarely mentioned is that so many of these shooters have been on a psychotropic / SSRI drug. Ann Blake Tracy of DrugAwareness.org has trying to get this message out for years, and there are so many modern drugs that have suicidal if not also homicidal ideations associated with them. One of our friends committed suicide while on Abilify. Tracy and also Dr. Peter Breggin are great sources for more information and how to wean off the drugs. In many cases also, the drugs have been used by the CIA -- see 'A Terrible Mistake' by Hank Albarelli.
FWIW, the handwriting samples don't match. The picture with the bolder lettering is from a different hand. The signatures don't match (note the "A" and the "n" - the swashes and hooks are different. The bolder sample is quicker and more artistic; the weaker sample is more slow and scribbly. Also, note the entirely different means of crossing small "t" in both samples. Also, note the numeral "3". One hooks; one does not. These are not the same author or copyist.
Good catch. I see some discrepancies in the two but I think the body of both are written by the same individual HOWEVER, they have both been CHANGED. For example, look at the encircled "time to die" at the bottom of the of the letter. The "m" is not the same as the m written in both letters (which starts with a straight line). The "d"s are similar in all three but your discovery of the "a" and "n" are also correct. With these facts, I believe it's safe to say that these are FORGERIES. Now, we just have to figure out WHY they were changed and who made the changes and what is their agenda for doing so?
I am rightfully confused on this whole transgender issue - one of its intended consequences. The picture looks like that of a perfectly natural female but she is called a "transgender man". How do we clear up the confusion of this? I say that whatever the person was born as, THAT is what we call them, for example, "Audrey, a GIRL that attempted to turn herself into a man". The phrase "transgender man" intimates that she IS a man which she clearly can not be nor ever can be. Let's lose the word 'transgender" completely since there is really no such thing. Every natural born person is either a male or a female; what they do to try to change themselves should be listed as a mental disorder not a common occurrence with the successful outcome of the desired effect, turning into that which they are NOT. So, I'm still confused. Is Audrey a male or a female?
Well, it's as usual not well written but at Langley, they're told to write them that way. I think I could have wrote a more believable one. Just sayin'
Manuel, are you okay? I haven't gotten a notification from your substack since Monday. Am I missing your daily newsletter? Let us know what's up if you're sick or something. We regulars worry about you. We live in a new world, not a brave one but a wicked one. Pls advise.
Thanks for asking. Yes all good. I don't know what's up with Substack... You aren't getting mails?
Nope. I figured it was something like that. So, I have a lot of catching up to do, huh? Good. I look forward to your newsletter and if I don't get it every day, I feel uninformed!
One fact that is rarely mentioned is that so many of these shooters have been on a psychotropic / SSRI drug. Ann Blake Tracy of DrugAwareness.org has trying to get this message out for years, and there are so many modern drugs that have suicidal if not also homicidal ideations associated with them. One of our friends committed suicide while on Abilify. Tracy and also Dr. Peter Breggin are great sources for more information and how to wean off the drugs. In many cases also, the drugs have been used by the CIA -- see 'A Terrible Mistake' by Hank Albarelli.
FWIW, the handwriting samples don't match. The picture with the bolder lettering is from a different hand. The signatures don't match (note the "A" and the "n" - the swashes and hooks are different. The bolder sample is quicker and more artistic; the weaker sample is more slow and scribbly. Also, note the entirely different means of crossing small "t" in both samples. Also, note the numeral "3". One hooks; one does not. These are not the same author or copyist.
Good catch. I see some discrepancies in the two but I think the body of both are written by the same individual HOWEVER, they have both been CHANGED. For example, look at the encircled "time to die" at the bottom of the of the letter. The "m" is not the same as the m written in both letters (which starts with a straight line). The "d"s are similar in all three but your discovery of the "a" and "n" are also correct. With these facts, I believe it's safe to say that these are FORGERIES. Now, we just have to figure out WHY they were changed and who made the changes and what is their agenda for doing so?
I am rightfully confused on this whole transgender issue - one of its intended consequences. The picture looks like that of a perfectly natural female but she is called a "transgender man". How do we clear up the confusion of this? I say that whatever the person was born as, THAT is what we call them, for example, "Audrey, a GIRL that attempted to turn herself into a man". The phrase "transgender man" intimates that she IS a man which she clearly can not be nor ever can be. Let's lose the word 'transgender" completely since there is really no such thing. Every natural born person is either a male or a female; what they do to try to change themselves should be listed as a mental disorder not a common occurrence with the successful outcome of the desired effect, turning into that which they are NOT. So, I'm still confused. Is Audrey a male or a female?
Well, it's as usual not well written but at Langley, they're told to write them that way. I think I could have wrote a more believable one. Just sayin'
I'm sure they will mention it on the Nightly News/MSM.../s.